This is a bit of a long post, but I have more information to share with you.
Last week I found what I thought was a heartening report from an independent study about smart meters which concluded:
“In summary, with respect to Industry Canada ICES 001 regulations for BC Hydro’s Smart Meters, there was a margin of 14 dB below legal radio interference limits but at only 20 cm from the meter; well below the requirements. With respect to ’s safe exposure limits, the un-averaged peak readings were only 0.002 percent of the safe legal limit.
“The investigation demonstrated that as tested in the purported worst case scenario, BC Hydro’s Smart Meters pose no threat of illegal radio interference, or health hazards according to Canadian regulations.”
I have since had my relief blown out of the water by the following:
This is the same Rob Stirling report which has already been identified by Michelle Khong to contain a huge (three orders of magnitude!) error in the field strength of the bank of smart meters measured in volts per meter. Apparently this Professional Engineer has trouble distinguishing between millivolts and microvolts.
The Stirling report concluded that the peak radio field detected at 20 cm from center of the network of 10 transmitting Smart Meters was 80 dBuV/m which he then converted to 10 microvolts per meter. As can be calculated from the following website: http://www.compeng.com.au/emc_conversion_tables_field_strength_calculator.aspx , 80 dBuV/m converts to 0.01 volts per meter (V/m), which is equivalent to 10 millivolts per meter, NOT 10 microvolts per meter (an underestimation of 1000 times, or THREE ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE.) The report goes on to calculate this as a percentage of Canada’s Safety Code 6 guideline of 49 V/m and incorrectly arrives at 0.002 percent. The correct figure is 0.02 percent because Stirling makes another error using his own incorrect figure when calculating the percentage.
In fact, throughout the article, out of four uses of the unit “microvolts,” three are incorrect and should have “millivolts” substituted to correct them. Each of these is out by a factor of 1000, or three orders of magnitude. Only the third instance at the top of page 6 is correct. Regardless of his measurements and how they compare to Safety Code 6, the whole analysis of safety is nonsense because Safety Code 6 has been demonstrated to be inappropriate with respect to the safety of exposure to microwave radiation since it only considers thermal effects and not non-thermal biological effects which have been proven by peer-reviewed science.
The BC Center for Disease Control released a report in June of last year which reports vastly higher field strength readings than Stirling’s at the same measurement distance of 20 cm. Converting The BC CDC measurement of 0.02 mW/cm2 to V/m using the previously mentioned calculator yields 8.68 V/m. This is 868 times the field strength reported by Stirling.
To summarize, the Stirling report:
1) indicates a field strength over 800 times less than the result measured by the BC Center for Disease Control;
2) has at least four technical errors, three of which are off by a factor of 1000, putting the entire analysis into question;
3) evaluates the safety of the smart meter’s microwave field strength using Canada’s Safety Code 6, an outdated, inappropriate standard that only considers thermal effects without considering non-thermal biological effects which have been proven by peer-reviewed science.
Hugh Hinskens, B.Sc. Physics, EET
Here’s a a table that will blow you away in terms of international standards–600 µwatts/cm2 is basically Code 6!

US Nuclear Expert Dr. Daniel Hirsch: The Cumulative radiation emitted by Smart Meters are at least 100 time more powerful than a cell phone.
Comments on the Draft Report by the California Council on Science and Technology
“Health Impacts of Radio Frequency from Smart Meters”
And here is an email from Ted Olnyk head of BC Hydro, to Richard Hughes about how to not get a Smart Meter installed for now.
From: Olynyk, Ted [mailto:Ted.Olynyk@bchydro.com]
Sent: January-17-12 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: Do Not Install
Richard
For do not installs you need to one or both of these:
Put a note on your meter indication your desire
And/ or
An email to smartmeters@bchydro.com with your address
Hope things are well.
Ted
Ted Olynyk
BC Hydro